Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sherman Underwood

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
16
Honda and Clone Engines / Re: New Topic! Harbor Freight 420cc Clone
« on: February 19, 2013, 06:38:03 pm »
Where can i get Gaskets for a 420 HF. Need a head gasket.

LCT  liquid combustion technology.....they make that motor for HF.... there web is www.lctusa.com

17
Honda and Clone Engines / Re: How hard would this be?
« on: February 19, 2013, 06:30:22 pm »
How difficult would it be to get a GX390 to rev to 8,000 rpm with stock size valve seats?

I know of a couple... Hint.... lots of port work and very good cam profile, I wont reveal everything 8). I will say this, there is a big difference in a motor that will rev to 8000 and one that makes power all the way to 8000....!! :woo:

18
Chassis / Re: Various Stock frame widths and wheel base
« on: January 31, 2013, 05:35:53 pm »

"must retain original manufacturers (OEM) specifications (no chopping)"

OEM spec would be as manufactured.
It should state if the frame may be widened and what the limit would be.

Tom

the more questions, the more rules are made & changed. Lets just take it as a gray area....!!!!

19
Chassis / Re: Various Stock frame widths and wheel base
« on: January 26, 2013, 03:14:05 pm »
Your right Zack. Might as well lock this thread and remove it. Doesn't do any good to talk about rules. But on the other hand, would this new ruling have been made if someone didn't bring up the question?

Glenn, it's my understanding it was already being addressed before you posted this.....

Quote....The problem I see with that is then they turn into go karts and that is not what the majority of us want....Quote

If this is the one thing that is keeping them like mowers instead of GO KARTS something is wrong, not to mention they are mostly concealed from view.  What about the engines, sheet metal,  hoods and fenders & so on that makes it a mower.  (Isn't it most important (to look as close to possible as still a mower).

20
Kohler Engines / Re: Horizontal Command Single?
« on: January 26, 2013, 10:33:40 am »
its only for the twin, but you can get some one to make a hub....... :thumbsup:

21
Chassis / Re: Various Stock frame widths and wheel base
« on: January 25, 2013, 01:36:50 pm »
I hope more than just US looks at this. all clubs and groups and racers alike.

most are as we speak and I'm sure it will be brought up at our local club's rule meetings......

22
Chassis / Re: Various Stock frame widths and wheel base
« on: January 25, 2013, 01:34:10 pm »


thanks Rooster..... :twothumbsup:

23
Chassis / Re: Various Stock frame widths and wheel base
« on: January 25, 2013, 01:00:49 pm »
BUT Jim in our mind in our interpretation we dont have a question we do not have doubt. We just build it. it not a lack of or intent to ignore or cheat.

 :+1:  (gray area)

24
Chassis / Re: Various Stock frame widths and wheel base
« on: January 25, 2013, 12:46:51 pm »
while I do understand the point of the rules and why we need to follow them, I do also understand this is the unlimited class so to speak, what fun is it not push the gray area of rules.  It's not like any other class period.....if I or anyone else wanted the same basic stuff we would run BP or some other class......this class to me is mean't to push the very edge of the envelope of a racing lawn mower to see how far it can and will go.... (the term Factory Experimental) that in itself says it all.... :woo:

25
Chassis / Re: Various Stock frame widths and wheel base
« on: January 25, 2013, 12:19:40 pm »
Here ya go simple to the point and fair to all. The rest of the rules cover it ie wheel base a minimum 42 etc. Who cares about the length the frame demensions above controls that. This would make ALL legal. Including those clubs that are starting the new limilted mods they can now prgress up into the top tier classes with just a motor upgrade.
Again just my 2 cents and thats all I am adding.

 :+1:

26
Chassis / Re: Various Stock frame widths and wheel base
« on: January 25, 2013, 11:43:43 am »
Ya also can't retro-actively change a rule that would make the super majority illegal.  That's how you lose racers.

Drew, I so hope this is true.  But in today's world you never know..!!!!

27
Chassis / Re: Various Stock frame widths and wheel base
« on: January 25, 2013, 11:07:54 am »
Its not a matter of ignoring or not caring. You must realize some of us were building these before the rules were made. Some interpret the rules a differently. These classes should allow more diversity in building. set a max width, taking a square channel frame and simply widening it from its original width by a mere 2-3 inches is far cheaper and easier than building a third frame rail and using 3 bearings on an axle. I mean jeeze they dont look like they used to anyways. these two classes are the elite the PRO SERIES so to speak. let us build it give a base line measurement and be done with it. For that matter why not allow a squre tube frame 1x2 for example. It would be easier and more cost effective than trying to make a flimsey wore out mower chassis hold up to the fastest class out there. Just my two cents. I aint gonna lie to ya. I been 15" wide from day 1 way back been racing them from the beginning. tech has never said anything. For that matter mine look more like a mower than many. I use real mower decks to boot. it dont matter to me they are built and i am not gonna change them even if it means stay home and play in my own back yard. I truly dont see where its a big deal. The only advantage is it leaves me more money and time to use elsewhere.
Exactly benewco we can scracth build a fx frame but we are restricted on these. And also the same size wheel and tore on the same axle WHY FX can run stagger yet the pro series to top teer classes cannot!!! OK I am done!!! AND BTW if you look hard enough you will see there are a few scratch built frames already running. they aint no faster than anyone else either.

well put.......to be honest I really don't think when the rules were made initially or even now, that they thought of this instance, for one because we are pioneering this particular class and are still learning what makes it safer and easier to build, not to mention more affordable with less parts breakage.....Our goal here should be balance and  (fairness) there is no way this particular issue gives an advantage.....also some myself included are building a new chassis almost ever year to capitalize on what we are learning though out the year previously.  therefore I think rules should be up for discussion and possible change due to these factors......just my .02......

 now....As a side note, I personally really like this class and I can tell you for a fact, that It has a good future in the racing industry. Reason being its a spectator magnet...!!!!  It's good for the clubs and racing organizations as far a revenue, and spectator attendance...!!!!

28
Chassis / Re: Various Stock frame widths and wheel base
« on: January 24, 2013, 11:00:32 pm »
If the width is enforced on rail chassis then 75 percent or more are illegal. Many have widened them to get away from the the bearing.

I agree with you on this one......most will be, it's is the only way not to run a 3rd bearing keep costs down, and have more fab work...!!!!!
Mower count is already low we don't need to run off those people with machines built already, I say limit 15 wide and be done with it....

29
Post your Pics! / Re: 2013 Midwest Super Cub FXS (CUBZILLA)
« on: January 23, 2013, 10:55:56 pm »
can't wait to see and here it when it's finished Drew.....

30
Post your Pics! / Re: 2013 paint job
« on: January 21, 2013, 02:53:09 pm »
Shhh. When hes not looking someone should put chevy sticker on it lol.

hey I'm all for it...!!!!!

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7