Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Old Goat

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 62
16
Briggs OHV & Vanguard / Re: v twin gearing
« on: December 17, 2013, 08:16:23 pm »
I just need to go back to lawn mower racing school, that's all !!!  :P :P :P
YUP! I would try an go, because I think you would make an excellent teacher!

Supermods are not that much faster.
Tom
WHAT!!! I want some of that stuff yer drinkin!

17
Briggs OHV & Vanguard / Re: v twin gearing
« on: December 09, 2013, 09:53:06 pm »
Chuck, 2 to 1 on the motor side, and 4.5 to1 on the axle side gives you a 9 to 1 ratio. He would need to be 3.25 to 1 on the final drive side to get 6.5 to 1.

And, Jim, I have just over $1500.00 in my motor on the SMT, and I don't usually get run over,

18
Tires / Re: Hoosier tire question
« on: October 27, 2012, 10:59:01 pm »
Pretty close. Put the biggest one on the outside.

19
Tires / Re: Hoosier tire question
« on: October 27, 2012, 10:54:33 pm »
I just went down and taped mine... 39.5" with 10psi.

20
Tires / Re: Hoosier tire question
« on: October 27, 2012, 10:18:06 pm »
I run the 12x9x6 on 9-1/4" wide rims. They round up in the middle, but it does't seem to hurt them, and they seem to wear evenly. Of course, I don't know how they'll work on your mower, because they will be spinning about 100 thousand mph! :pffftt: :D

21
Briggs OHV & Vanguard / Re: Vanguard cranks
« on: October 22, 2012, 11:30:39 pm »
I believe the part of the crank that is inside the engine is all the same as long as it's for a vertical shaft, other than the two sizes of upper main bearing journals and the 30 has a shorter throw than the 35 and 38 cranks.  However, Briggs made cranks with about 16 gazillion different pto ends... different lengths, tapered, stepped down, etc. That's why they have so many different part numbers.

22
Coffee Shop / Re: Duck Dynasty on A&E
« on: October 11, 2012, 08:34:14 pm »
Well, I gotta say, I watched the whole show and I thought it was GREAT! And I'll bet there was more than one person who watched the show and said... That's neat, I'm gonna have to check out these racing mowers! I think I can do that!

I'm sure it will get more people interested in our sport than somebody saying "Do we really want those idiots in our sport."  Everybody has to start somewhere. I know how I got started in this sport, and safety was not even close to being on the top of my list. I just wanted to go as fast as possible! It's a lot different, now, (all though I still want to go as fast as possible!) but I'm just saying that I'll bet a lot of the mower racers in this country started out the same way I did.

They don't need someone putting them down, they just need encouraged in the right direction.

23
Coffee Shop / Re: Hay bales around the track
« on: October 04, 2012, 07:55:13 pm »
I agree with what Ted said! Like I said before, I've seen a lot of wrecks over the years, that never would have happened if the bales would have been 5 or 10 feet off the track.

OK, thanks, Joey. Yup, I'm going to Mechanicsville. See ya there.  :D

24
USLMRA Races / Re: 2012 SAM ROGERS US ALL AMERICAN OPEN
« on: October 03, 2012, 11:02:08 pm »
 :woohoo: I just got permission from my boss.... I mean, my wife.... I'm allowed to go!!!! :woohoo: :D

25
Coffee Shop / Hay bales around the track
« on: October 02, 2012, 09:34:53 pm »
I'm just wanting to complain a little bit. I don't like hay bales around the track. I think they are dangerous. In the years that I've been racing I think I've seen more wrecks from mowers hitting hay bales than from any other reason. I agree that sometimes they are needed in certain places to protect the driver from obstacles around the track, or to protect the spectators from a runaway mower, BUT I think they should be as far away from the race track as possible, instead of right around the edge of the track. On Sunday I was racing in Maryland. I was wide open, just a gettin' it, about half way down the back stretch. I didn't think I was as close to the bales as I was and clipped one with the right rear tire. They sucked me right in and spun me around. I went from wide open to a dead stop in about 10 feet. The bales were tightly packed and pretty heavy (I know, cause I helped put them there!) I stayed on the mower and it stayed on its wheels, but any other mower, other than a Super Mod, and I would have been tumbling and flipping out through the weeds. So, what I'm trying to say is, if you need to have hay bales, or any other type of barrier around your track, try to keep them as far away as possible. It will make it a lot safer for everybody.

26
Driveline / Re: running chain from vert motor to ragb
« on: October 02, 2012, 06:20:53 pm »
Well, I guess here is my 2 cents.  I also run about 1.6:1 ratio between the motor and the jackshaft. I don't want to make Ryan mad, but I think George is right. Think of it this way.... If you would measure the amount of power it takes to turn the jackshaft, the more gear reduction you have between the front jackshaft sprocket (on the axle side) and the rear axle, the easier the jackshaft would be to turn. So with the majority of the gear reduction between the jackshaft and the rear axle this will take some of the load off of the lighter  primary chain.

I remember a few years ago, Ryan used to have trouble with the jackshaft twisting in the middle. I think he was running about 3:1 ratio between the motor and the jackshaft, which would put more torque on the jackshaft, causing it to twist in the middle.

27
Chassis / Re: CLUB Classes
« on: September 28, 2012, 10:50:29 pm »
The chassis rules appear to be the the same as the Super Mod rules, except for the frame. What if somebody builds one and then in a year or two, they decide they would like to go a little faster and do a little motor work to turn it into a full blown Super Mod? It wouldn't be legal if they had built their own frame. Why not keep the rules the same, except for the engine? That would help out with the local classes and possibly the national classes later on.

28
Briggs OHV & Vanguard / Re: 31 cube????
« on: September 26, 2012, 10:13:51 pm »
Unless you know the engine year and model number, or the Briggs piston part number, you might have a hard time getting rings. They seem to like to change them a lot.

29
Briggs OHV & Vanguard / Re: 31 cube????
« on: September 26, 2012, 12:21:36 am »
Click the link and open the file.  http://www.heymow.com/index.php?topic=12522.0

A 31 ci has a 3.556 bore, so I believe you got a 31... just like Birdman said.

Look under Briggs Flathead, the 4th post down that says Briggs Specs Torq

30
Briggs OHV & Vanguard / Re: single head
« on: August 27, 2012, 11:22:24 pm »

We will be trying this on a 33" with around 14:5 comp ratio, .545x278@.050 cam and a HSR 46mm carb.

14.5 to 1 compression?  I see you shaved a LOT off the head. Good luck trying to keep head gaskets in it.

46mm is almost 2 inches??? 

.545 lift X 1.6 ratio rockers = .872" of lift at the valve. What kind of funky valve springs you got? Gonna have to dig some pretty deep holes in the top of the piston.

Check these out... http://www.ferrea.com/domestic-valves-competition-plus-valves-blanks.php
The FO174 is what I always used for the briggs single.Its a real nice intake valve and it works well. Plus it's a blank, so you can make it longer, which your gonna need for that kind of lift.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 62
anything